If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ You must be an NCRS member before you can post: click the Join NCRS link above to join. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you have trouble logging in you can clear your cookies here!
Please forgive my ...lack of knowledge...but as I'm hearing GM label the C7 engine a small block, I'm wondering exactly what is the criterion used in the industry to classify an engine as a big vs. small block. I know in the Camaro world the 1969 350ci engine was a small block and the 396ci engine was a big block. Is it just a certain cylinder volume cutoff, or what?
Please forgive my ...lack of knowledge...but as I'm hearing GM label the C7 engine a small block, I'm wondering exactly what is the criterion used in the industry to classify an engine as a big vs. small block. I know in the Camaro world the 1969 350ci engine was a small block and the 396ci engine was a big block. Is it just a certain cylinder volume cutoff, or what?
Thanks!
Probably the 4.4" bore centers - that's been a constant since the first 265 V-8 in 1955; big-blocks are 4.84".
My mistake, I could have sworn that's where I saw one.
Mike
Mike and Terry-----
The "W" block, including the 409, was used in trucks. In fact, MD and HD trucks of the early 60's are one of the last remaining sources for original 409 blocks.
Then we have the case of the 348 and it's big uncle the 409 which some classify both ways...
Jack-----
There was some parts commonality between the 348/409 and small blocks (things like harmonic balancers and fuel pumps). However, GM always considered the 348/409 to be a big block series engine. In fact, being classified as the Mark I, it was the ORIGINAL big block. The 409 had the largest bore size of any PRODUCTION V-8 ever used in a Chevrolet in modern times. Only one other GM PRODUCTION engine of the period ever even equaled its bore size.
OK; I throw you another curve ball. Does not the Chevy Nascar Engine(ROX Engine) also called a "small block" have 4.5 " center to center bores?
Correct me if I'm wrong. Larry
I believe that's correct. Last time I heard it was called R07, and it is a unique engine for NASCAR that doesn't share any parts with any past or present small blocks.
In an attempt to get more revs, which means more power, Chrysler cam up with a 4.125" x (about) 3.25" (can you say 327) configuration, and every one else had to follow. In order to prevent this from escalating, NASCAR limited engine bore to this value.
So in order to get this bore without siamizing the cylinders, Chevrolet had to increase the bore center spacing, but as I said above, even though this engine is about the same physical size and displacement as the classic 350, it shares nothing with any generation production small block.
That and the tube frame architecture is why they are no longer "stock cars".
I believe that's correct. Last time I heard it was called R07, and it is a unique engine for NASCAR that doesn't share any parts with any past or present small blocks.
In an attempt to get more revs, which means more power, Chrysler cam up with a 4.125" x (about) 3.25" (can you say 327) configuration, and every one else had to follow. In order to prevent this from escalating, NASCAR limited engine bore to this value.
So in order to get this bore without siamizing the cylinders, Chevrolet had to increase the bore center spacing, but as I said above, even though this engine is about the same physical size and displacement as the classic 350, it shares nothing with any generation production small block.
That and the tube frame architecture is why they are no longer "stock cars".
Duke
Duke-----
Yes, I don't think there's an engine in NASCAR today that's in any way based on a PRODUCTION engine or that shares any components with a PRODUCTION
engine. I think the last one that was actually partially based on a PRODUCTION engine was the GM engine with SB2 cylinder heads. The bottom end of that engine was based on a PRODUCTION Gen I small block.
This past year at the NCRS convention there was a NASCAR car on display. As we looked at it, a fellow that was manning the display came over and asked us if we had any questions. I then asked him about the engine. He told me it was a stock-based engine just as could be purchased through any GM dealer. I didn't ask him any more questions.
Yes, I don't think there's an engine in NASCAR today that's in any way based on a PRODUCTION engine or that shares any components with a PRODUCTION
engine. I think the last one that was actually partially based on a PRODUCTION engine was the GM engine with SB2 cylinder heads. The bottom end of that engine was based on a PRODUCTION Gen I small block.
This past year at the NCRS convention there was a NASCAR car on display. As we looked at it, a fellow that was manning the display came over and asked us if we had any questions. I then asked him about the engine. He told me it was a stock-based engine just as could be purchased through any GM dealer. I didn't ask him any more questions.
Joe:
From what I have heard the (ROX or RO7) engine is kinda a blend between the older S/B Chevy Engine and the LS Engine. NASCAR will not permit the
Chevy Teams to use a pure LS type all out engine because it would produce too much horsepower making the series unbalanced. Larry
Comment