Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Michael J.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • January 27, 2009
    • 7032

    #16
    Re: Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

    Originally posted by Gene Manno (8571)
    Preserving this car with the history of wear and tear by persons other than Armstrong is a farce. Who cares about a used up vehicle as claimed which it is not. It seems someone is just attempting to get a lot of attention to a "fabricated preservation" for eventual $ profit. I think I said the same as Roy but in much bolder terms.
    Ditto, and was it rode hard and put up wet, or rode hard and put away wet?
    Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

    Comment

    • Kenneth B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • September 1, 1984
      • 2078

      #17
      Re: Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

      Originally posted by Michael Johnson (49879)
      An interesting story. Not sure I would preserve it in this manner, but not sure what it would look like vs. a full restoration. In any event, it won't be driven anymore.
      http://blog.hemmings.com/index.php/2...on/?refer=news
      For the younger members this Corvette was what most of the cars looked like back in the day.Some better & some worse. There were very few nice Corvettes around because in the early 70'S you could buy one for 1500/2000 dollars. Flairs. ribbon paint,replaced motor & roll & tuck was the norm. An that is the way it was in the day.
      65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
      What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

      Comment

      • Michael J.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • January 27, 2009
        • 7032

        #18
        Re: Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

        Originally posted by Kenneth Barry (7808)
        For the younger members this Corvette was what most of the cars looked like back in the day.Some better & some worse. There were very few nice Corvettes around because in the early 70'S you could buy one for 1500/2000 dollars. Flairs. ribbon paint,replaced motor & roll & tuck was the norm. An that is the way it was in the day.
        Exactly, and don't forget all the Edelbrock speed equipment and those all important California six tail lights, what a look!
        Big Tanks In the High Mountains of New Mexico

        Comment

        • Kenneth B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • September 1, 1984
          • 2078

          #19
          Re: Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

          Originally posted by Michael Johnson (49879)
          Exactly, and don't forget all the Edelbrock speed equipment and those all important California six tail lights, what a look!
          AH The good old days. If it didn't say Elderbrock/ Mallory & 5" stove side pipes it didn't go fast.
          65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
          What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE

          Comment

          • Tim G.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • March 1, 1990
            • 1334

            #20
            Re: Neil Armstrong Corvette being "preserved".

            Comment

            Working...
            Searching...Please wait.
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

            Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
            An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
            There are no results that meet this criteria.
            Search Result for "|||"