67 JM typo?

[Keith B.]

for the alternators it list 694 for the a 427/390 with AC 51 amps. then a 750 for a 390 with AC and TI thats 61 amps. while the Nolan Adams book states it should be a 750. dads car does not have TI but factory AC and what appears correct date) to be the original 750 alt. so what should it be

[Brian M.]

Re: 67 JM typo?

I believe all 67 A/C cars were the 750 61A.

[John H.]

Re: 67 JM typo?

for the alternators it list 694 for the a 427/390 with AC 51 amps. then a 750 for a 390 with AC and TI thats 61 amps. while the Nolan Adams book states it should be a 750. dads car does not have TI but factory AC and what appears correct date) to be the original 750 alt. so what should it be

Keith -

The most current edition of the '67 JG (Fourth Edition, 2nd Printing, Winter 2005), chart on page 115, shows that either the 694 or 750 is correct for a 427/390 with A/C but without T.I., and the chart is footnoted as such.

[Keith B.]

Re: 67 JM typo?

I have the Forth Edition but not sure what printing. but thanks for clearing that up.

[John H.]

Re: 67 JM typo?

I have the Forth Edition but not sure what printing. but thanks for clearing that up.

Keith -

The original Fourth Edition (not dated on the inside front cover like the Second Printing is) also has the footnoted chart on page 115.