i removed my original leaf springs 15 months ago, because I thought they were worn out and the car was lower on drivers side (broken leaf). Replaced them with aftermarket springs. I do not recall taking measurements when the old leaf springs were on the car to compare year 2010 ride height to original ride height shown in Nolan Adam's book.
I have been trying to decide whether to replace the broken leaf and restore both sets or whether it is really worth the expense and time since they are no longer on the car. New ride height in rear is 3" higher than height shown in Nolan Adam's book.
I measured the center line distance from eye to eye on the long leaf and it is 49-3/8 inches, both sets. The limited information I found on the Restorer DVD showed 51 inches. The drop height is 5-1/2 inches on both sets, including the side with broken leaf. Why 49-3/8" instead of 51"? Given these measurements, were the springs worn out?
I really need some feeback, pros and cons. The car is a driver.
I have been trying to decide whether to replace the broken leaf and restore both sets or whether it is really worth the expense and time since they are no longer on the car. New ride height in rear is 3" higher than height shown in Nolan Adam's book.
I measured the center line distance from eye to eye on the long leaf and it is 49-3/8 inches, both sets. The limited information I found on the Restorer DVD showed 51 inches. The drop height is 5-1/2 inches on both sets, including the side with broken leaf. Why 49-3/8" instead of 51"? Given these measurements, were the springs worn out?
I really need some feeback, pros and cons. The car is a driver.
Comment