'66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Gary B.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • February 1, 1997
    • 6853

    '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

    The bolts that held the upper A-arms to the frame on my '66, which I believe to be original to the car, should be GM # 3888248. My bolts are 7/16-20 x 2.125" long. The bolts are rusty and there is no indication remaining of the original finish, but based on the rust, I suspect they were black phosphate, rather than zinc or cad. The '66 TIM&JG is silent on the finish. Can anyone confirm they were black phosphate?

    GM 388248 was available in service. Does anyone know the finish of the service part?

    Thanks,

    Gary
  • John D.
    Very Frequent User
    • July 1, 1991
    • 874

    #2
    Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

    gary,

    The drawing shows "Bolt special head 7/16-20 x 2 1/4"
    Material 300-M steel, no finish specified- phosphate or otherwise.

    Comment

    • Gary B.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • February 1, 1997
      • 6853

      #3
      Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

      John,

      If no finish is specified on the GM drawing, does that mean that any finish the vendor chose would have been acceptable?

      Gary

      Comment

      • Gene M.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • April 1, 1985
        • 4232

        #4
        Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

        I think you will find from disassembly of originals the finish was black. I'm not sure if it was phosphate or a black oxide. But I fairly sure it is not black zinc. Most all high grade bolts were not zinc as it causes hydrogen brittleness with out heat treatment.

        Comment

        • John D.
          Very Frequent User
          • July 1, 1991
          • 874

          #5
          Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

          gene,

          The drawing does say "decarburization classification C or better". I don't know if that process imparts a black finish or not.
          There may well have been a finish on these bolts... it's just not called out on this drawing.

          john

          Comment

          • Gary B.
            Extremely Frequent Poster
            • February 1, 1997
            • 6853

            #6
            '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; decarburization spec

            Gene,

            I think you are correct on the black finish, but I've talked with one other person who is restoring a '66 and he plans on using zinc plated hardware.

            Are there any metallurgists out there who would know whether the decarburization spec would apply to a bolt that was zinc or cad plated?

            Gary

            Comment

            • John D.
              Very Frequent User
              • July 1, 1991
              • 874

              #7
              Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

              I consulted with a friend who is a Fastener Engineer here's what he had to say:

              The decarburization note is not a finish but just a specification to have them verify they did not cause excessive carbon loss during the normal heat treatment process.

              I would expect the bolt would appear black and oily. A plain finished bolt like this would end up getting phosphate and oil to keep it from rusting prior to installation. Once it hit the weather, this finish would end up rusting pretty fast. The phosphate is just a wash in zinc phosphate to create a porous matrix of crystals on the surface. It is then dipped in the oil which fills in the porous holes and creates the coating. Without the phosphate, the oil would quickly drain off the bolt and into the box it came in. This finish was very common on our bolts. It was pretty much the standard.

              Comment

              • Gary B.
                Extremely Frequent Poster
                • February 1, 1997
                • 6853

                #8
                Calling Joe Lucia

                Joe,

                Do you have any NOS 3888248 in your collection? Are they black phosphate?

                Gary

                Comment

                • James E.
                  Expired
                  • April 1, 1988
                  • 26

                  #9
                  Re: Calling Joe Lucia

                  Gary:
                  I have some NOS upper control arm bolts,PT# 381909. Bought back in the 80's,they are listed for 68-76,they are black.Hope this might help.

                  Comment

                  • Gene M.
                    Extremely Frequent Poster
                    • April 1, 1985
                    • 4232

                    #10
                    Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

                    The replacement upper A arm shim bolts are 7/16 course thread for c3's. The c2 originals were 7/16 fine thread. They (course thread) will fit and function perfectly but may not flight judge well if you have a knowledgeable c2 chassis judge.

                    Comment

                    • Gary B.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • February 1, 1997
                      • 6853

                      #11
                      Anyone remember what Joe Tripoli lists in his book...

                      for the finish of these bolts?

                      Gary

                      Comment

                      • Dick W.
                        Former NCRS Director Region IV
                        • July 1, 1985
                        • 10483

                        #12
                        Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

                        All the ones that I removed appeared to have the black finish in the protected areas.

                        I think that John Daly answered the question. With his knowledge and being a GM employee, I trust his answers
                        Last edited by Dick W.; February 12, 2010, 01:10 PM. Reason: kan't spall
                        Dick Whittington

                        Comment

                        • John H.
                          Beyond Control Poster
                          • December 1, 1997
                          • 16513

                          #13
                          Re: '66 upper A-arm to frame bolts; GM 3888248

                          As far as I know, they're standard GM phosphate-and-oil; have never seen them with any other finish.

                          Comment

                          • John D.
                            Very Frequent User
                            • July 1, 1991
                            • 874

                            #14
                            Re: Calling Joe Lucia

                            Originally posted by James Ellis (12624)
                            Gary:
                            I have some NOS upper control arm bolts,PT# 381909. Bought back in the 80's,they are listed for 68-76,they are black.Hope this might help.
                            James

                            The 382909 bolt drawing shows a 7/16-14 thread with no finish specified. It must have the same standard black phosphate finish as the 3888248 with the 7/16-20 thread...

                            jd

                            Comment

                            • Gary B.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • February 1, 1997
                              • 6853

                              #15
                              GM 3888248 vs 382909

                              John,

                              Sounds like another nail in the zinc/cad finish coffin.

                              Does the GM drawing for 382909 also specify the same decarburization class C spec?

                              Gary

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"