Alternator Pulley

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Erv M.
    Very Frequent User
    • February 21, 2007
    • 445

    Alternator Pulley

    On a 69 alternator, in replacing a pulley are the threads standard, meaning to loosen is counterclockwise or are thet reversed?
  • Wayne M.
    Expired
    • March 1, 1980
    • 6414

    #2
    Re: Alternator Pulley

    Originally posted by Erv Myers (46978)
    On a 69 alternator, in replacing a pulley are the threads standard, meaning to loosen is counterclockwise or are thet reversed?
    Erv -- I'm pretty sure they're standard; ie facing bolt and front of alternator, turn NUT clockwise to tighten.

    But when you insert the 5/16" hex wrench in the end of the rotor shaft, if you chose to hold the wrench on the nut stationary, then you turn the hex in the shaft end counter-clockwise to tighten.

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43129

      #3
      Re: Alternator Pulley

      Originally posted by Wayne Midkiff (3437)
      Erv -- I'm pretty sure they're standard; ie facing bolt and front of alternator, turn NUT clockwise to tighten.

      But when you insert the 5/16" hex wrench in the end of the rotor shaft, if you chose to hold the wrench on the nut stationary, then you turn the hex in the shaft end counter-clockwise to tighten.

      Wayne and Irv-----


      Yes, that's how it is, for sure. Also, the original nut, GM #1915172, was a standard, right-hand thread, 5/8-20 nut, but thinner (1/4") than a standard hex nut. The later GM replacement, GM #1911324, was a bit thicker, but still thinner than a standard hex nut.

      GM also listed another nut for Corvettes. It was GM #3947122. This nut was 5/8-20 X 1-3/8". This nut was NEVER used on a Corvette, though. I don't know what gave GM the idea it was.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Scott S.
        Extremely Frequent Poster
        • September 12, 2009
        • 1961

        #4
        Re: Alternator Pulley

        Originally posted by Joe Lucia (12484)
        Wayne and Irv-----


        Yes, that's how it is, for sure. Also, the original nut, GM #1915172, was a standard, right-hand thread, 5/8-20 nut, but thinner (1/4") than a standard hex nut. The later GM replacement, GM #1911324, was a bit thicker, but still thinner than a standard hex nut.

        GM also listed another nut for Corvettes. It was GM #3947122. This nut was 5/8-20 X 1-3/8". This nut was NEVER used on a Corvette, though. I don't know what gave GM the idea it was.
        Joe,

        I found some conflicting info regarding the alternator pulley washers, between what the AIMs depict and what the P&As say. My alternator is rebuilt and restored, so no originality clues there.

        Apparently the GM 1911324 Hex Nut you mentioned above was also used for 1963-1964 alternator pulleys (63 & 64 P&A, Gr. 2.280).

        Then it's GM 1915172 Hex Nut for 1965 through at least 1969. My question is about the associated Washers.


        1) Should all 1963-1966 Corvette alternators have a Hex Nut (GM 1911324 for 63-64, GM 1915172 for 65-67) + Lock Washer (split) (GM 1888439) + Wave Washer (GM 1941978) securing the alternator pulley, in that order?

        2) Should 1967 Corvette alternators have only the Hex Nut + Wave Washer securing the alternator pulley, or should 1967 have the split-lock washer too? The GM 1888439 split-Lock Washer was removed from Gr. 2.280 in the 67P&A, and my restored alternator appears to have a cad or zinc flat washer (approx. 1-3/32" OD) under the Hex Nut, with no split-lock washer. If there is a "wave" washer behind the flat washer, it must have a smaller OD, because I cannot see it.


        Edit: Just noticed in the back of the 67P&A it says "1888439 USE 1941978 . . . . 8-66". If that is not an error, it seems to say to substitute a second GM 1941978 Wave Washer in place of the GM 1888439 split-lock washer?
        Last edited by Scott S.; August 2, 2012, 05:55 PM.

        Comment

        Working...
        Searching...Please wait.
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

        Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
        An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
        There are no results that meet this criteria.
        Search Result for "|||"