If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ You must be an NCRS member before you can post: click the Join NCRS link above to join. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you have trouble logging in you can clear your cookies here!
Can someone tell me what model year C2 this goes to, and what engine configuration?
Chris Enstrom
North Central Chapter Judging Chairman
1967 Rally Red convertible, 327/350, 4 speed, Duntov @ Hampton in 2013, Founders @ KC in 2014, family owned since 1973
2011 Z06, red/red
Looks like a 40433, original to a 67 small block. It should have the number stamped on edge of the flange wich goes against the block.
Here's my original 40433 (refurbed of course) for comparison:
You can see the number on the flange. Yours seems to have the same fuel line fitting arrangement. Replacements just have a tube coming out the bottom for the inlet line.
On this one, I had my original fitting brazed to a replacement base.
Jerry Fuccillo
1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968
Yup, I have AC on both sides. Thanks Jerry for your post. Looks like I have the original fuel pump for the car, and a correct Paragon replacement.
My original
Here is my original with my poor job of trying to replicate the coating on the bottom half of the pump, next to a new repop on the right side. Overall, I'm really pleased with the repop.
Chris Enstrom
North Central Chapter Judging Chairman
1967 Rally Red convertible, 327/350, 4 speed, Duntov @ Hampton in 2013, Founders @ KC in 2014, family owned since 1973
2011 Z06, red/red
Does the Paragon one have the correct fittings in the base. Can't see it in your picture.
Just wondering. Looks like you did a real nice job on your car.
Thanks!
Here are two more looks at the pair of fuel pumps.
Chris Enstrom
North Central Chapter Judging Chairman
1967 Rally Red convertible, 327/350, 4 speed, Duntov @ Hampton in 2013, Founders @ KC in 2014, family owned since 1973
2011 Z06, red/red
A friend of a friend devised a recrimping machine and I sent this one out.
I sent him a new replacement 40503 for the innards plus my original. It got pretty complicated when my original had pinholes in the base, and he had to use the replacement base. He had to cut off the inlet tube and braze the inlet fitting from the original to the new base.
When I got it back, I zinc plated and dichromated the base.
This was at a time when a good 40433 repro was not available. With all the complication, if I had to do it now, I'd just buy the Paragon repro. But I had fun on this project.
The gentleman does not do this on a regular basis, but if you want to have it done, give me an email, and I will give you his contact information.
Make sure your original base is in good shape, or you will wind up with a complicated job like mine.
Jerry Fuccillo
1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968
Jerry,
He did a nice job roll forming the lip all around. Does he have a fixture for disassembly too?
The repop will receive deductions as the vent holes are different. Also the two added bosses at the rolled seam are in correct. A bit of finesse would/may go a long way on those bosses.
I'll contact you later on when I'm ready to redo mine. thank you
Jerry,
Did you notice on my pump it had 7E before the 40433 and Chris's pump appears to have FF? What does your pump have and is it a date code? I assumed my 7E translated to May 67 as I have a June car.
Jerry,
Did you notice on my pump it had 7E before the 40433 and Chris's pump appears to have FF? What does your pump have and is it a date code? I assumed my 7E translated to May 67 as I have a June car.
As you say, "having fun".
Rick
Rick,
Mine has FG prior to the 40433 for a late June 67. I don't think it is a date code. I remember some discussion on this, way back and I think the consensus was that it was some kind of a vendor code.
Having fun,
Jerry Fuccillo
1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968
Jerry,
He did a nice job roll forming the lip all around. Does he have a fixture for disassembly too?
The repop will receive deductions as the vent holes are different. Also the two added bosses at the rolled seam are in correct. A bit of finesse would/may go a long way on those bosses.
I'll contact you later on when I'm ready to redo mine. thank you
Gene,
I think he made his own tool for disassembly and recrimping. He sent me back my original base, and the decrimp looks good with only little tool marks at about 30 degrees around the inside periphery.
Of course, the repro base was decrimped from the 40503, and then recrimped to my original top. Too bad my original had rust pinholes through the bottom as it would have been reused, but glad he caught it.
Jerry Fuccillo
1967 327/300 Convertible since 1968
Mine has FG prior to the 40433 for a late June 67. I don't think it is a date code. I remember some discussion on this, way back and I think the consensus was that it was some kind of a vendor code.
Having fun,
Jerry,
I believe your "FG40433" fuel pump is dated June 1967 where the first letter "F"=June and the second letter "G" =1967.
The "FF40433" pump would be dated June 1966 (for an "early" 1967).
I base this fuel pump date coding theory on research that I have done over the last 20 or more years on many used and NOS 1964-1966 Chevrolet & Corvette 4657 fuel pumps. The 4657 fuel pumps also have a 2-digit casting year with radial line segments (up to 12 of them, one for each month) around the year located in an "unfinished" hole near one of the outlets. I have many examples. My best example is a "4657EF" pump (May 1966) with "66" casting with 3 radial line segments (Mar. 1966) from a complete 1966 327 engine with casting 3858180, casting date "E 18 6", and stamped "T0521 HAR" that I bought about 1980. The engine was very original and complete with original Roch. 4-bbl. carb, distributor, heads, alternator, etc., with "matching" date codes.
1st letter, "A" = Jan., "B" = Feb., etc.
2nd letter, "E" = 1965, "F" = 1966, "G"= 1967
The 1963-1964 AC 4657 pumps did not have this code and were only stamped "4657".
The date coding in the 1970's and 1980 was different.
Dave
Last edited by David L.; February 2, 2010, 11:22 AM.
Comment