1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • John M.
    Expired
    • November 10, 2008
    • 364

    1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

    Is the 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp "GL" ?

    I couldn't find it in a search and don't trust my memory as much as I used to.

    I thought I remembered reading "GL" somewhere.

    Thanks
  • Jeffrey S.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 1, 1988
    • 1860

    #2
    Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

    John:
    I believe the broadcast code for all '69 diverter valves was GJ (Bizzoko pages 114 and 115).
    Jeff

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43133

      #3
      Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

      Originally posted by John McNeely (49684)
      Is the 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp "GL" ?

      I couldn't find it in a search and don't trust my memory as much as I used to.

      I thought I remembered reading "GL" somewhere.

      Thanks
      John-----


      All 1969 small block diverter valves were the same and were coded "GL". 1969 big blocks, except L-88 and ZL-1, were coded "GJ". 1969 L-88 and ZL-1 were coded "DC".

      The 1968 big block valve for all Corvette big block applications was the same as the 1969 L-88 and ZL-1 valve and was coded the same "DC". 1968 small block valves were different than 1969 and had a different configuration.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • John M.
        Expired
        • November 10, 2008
        • 364

        #4
        Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

        Joe, I wish you were my next door neighbor

        Thanks yet again.

        Comment

        • Jeffrey S.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • June 1, 1988
          • 1860

          #5
          Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

          John:
          I would definitely trust Joe's info over any other source. I'm sorry that I posted an incorrect answer from a source that I thought to be accurate. Many times I have hesitated to post a response to a question that I thought to be right for this very reason. I will be more careful in the future.
          Jeff

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43133

            #6
            Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

            Originally posted by Jeffrey Salz (13182)
            John:
            I would definitely trust Joe's info over any other source. I'm sorry that I posted an incorrect answer from a source that I thought to be accurate. Many times I have hesitated to post a response to a question that I thought to be right for this very reason. I will be more careful in the future.
            Jeff
            Jeff-----


            No need to be more careful OR to hesitate to post based upon some doubt that exists in your mind. If we all decided not to post based upon some doubt that existed in our minds, there would be about 95% fewer posts on this board. It's perfectly OK to be incorrect; if others have contrary information they can post it. Neither this DISCUSSION board or anyone that posts to it, most definitely including myself, represent the "The Oracle".
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Jeffrey S.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • June 1, 1988
              • 1860

              #7
              Re: 1969 L46 Diverter valve Stamp

              Joe:
              Thanks for the words of encouragement. I will continue to try to participate when I can but don't for a minute minimize your value to this board- you ARE the one (among others) we all look to for sound advise. We others all pale by comparison. Have a Merry Christmas and a happy New Year!!
              Jeff

              Comment

              Working...
              Searching...Please wait.
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
              There are no results that meet this criteria.
              Search Result for "|||"