870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Peter C.
    Expired
    • August 27, 2008
    • 8

    870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

    Dear NCRS members:

    My name is Peter Cook and I am a new NCRS member. I have been reading your technical discussions for the past few weeks and I have been impressed by the vast pool of knowledge and how helpful everyone is. I hope that you can all help me with proper identification of this 870 block.

    My vette is a 1964 roadster (VIN 40867 S107393 and "D18" assembly date) which I purchased two years ago without the original motor in it but with a block, crank, pistons, rods and heads which were purportedly the original block and heads for the motor. The block and heads were severely rusted from being left out in the elements for many years.

    A month or so ago I finally got around to trying to disassemble the engine but it was so rusted up I needed to bring the block to a machine shop for disassembly. During my attempted disassembly of the block, pistons and rods I noticed that the following: i.) all of the main, cam and rod bearings were brand new; ii.) the distrbutor was no longer attached to the engine but the distributor shaft was still there with its gear enmeshed with the camshaft; and iii.) there were no numbers or letters on the engine stamping pad. I discussed these facts with the machine shop and they seemed to believe that the block had been rebuilt many years ago (including the block being decked) and the distributor gear failed at initial start-up or shortly thereafter causing the engine to be shelved.

    Before sinking anymore money into this block I want to identify this block so that I can be sure of what I am dealing with. The block markings and information are as follows:
    1.) Engine block no. 3782870;
    2.) Foundry date on rear lip of block is "K28";
    3.) No engine pad stamps (apparently block was previously decked);
    4.) Ten dot forging clock above block no.;
    5.) Tell-tale Saginaw/Flint plug above timing chain area;
    6.) The numeral "3" next to the letters "GM" directly below the casting number; and
    7.) The machine shop has confirmed that this is a small journal block.

    Questions that I trying to get answered include the following:

    a.) Why does this block with a K28 casting date , apparently November 28, 1963, have no year included in the casting date?

    b.) According to my calendar November 28, 1963 was the fourth Thursday in November (viz., Thanksgiving day), was the Saginaw foundry really working on Thanksgiving day back in 1963?

    c.) Does the "3" next to the letters "GM" indicate that the block was cast in 1963?

    d.) Why does this block have a 10 dot clock on it if forged in 1963 (other threads indicate that this was feature did not appear uintil some time in 1964)?

    I look forward to your responses.

    Best regards,


    Peter Cook

    Direct view of pics from photobucket
    http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_1.jpg
    http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_2.jpg
    http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_3.jpg
  • Chuck G.
    Extremely Frequent Poster
    • June 1, 1982
    • 2028

    #2
    Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

    Looks like K 2 3 to me. Often hard to tell 3's from 8's in small castings.

    The casting clock shown began in 64 model year usage as I recall.


    Chuck
    1963 Corvette Conv. 327/360 NCRS Top Flight
    2006 Corvette Conv. Velocity Yellow NCRS Top Flight
    1956 Chevy Sedan. 350/4 Speed Hot Rod

    Comment

    • Chuck G.
      Extremely Frequent Poster
      • June 1, 1982
      • 2028

      #3
      Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

      Here's the pic direct.
      Last edited by Chuck G.; December 20, 2008, 07:06 AM.
      1963 Corvette Conv. 327/360 NCRS Top Flight
      2006 Corvette Conv. Velocity Yellow NCRS Top Flight
      1956 Chevy Sedan. 350/4 Speed Hot Rod

      Comment

      • John H.
        Beyond Control Poster
        • December 1, 1997
        • 16513

        #4
        Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

        I agree - K 2 3 (November 2, 1963), not K 2 8.

        Comment

        • Steven B.
          Extremely Frequent Poster
          • July 1, 1982
          • 3936

          #5
          Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

          Isn't there a method, using heat I believe, to bring numbers traces out from a pad that has been decked?
          Last edited by Steven B.; September 7, 2008, 06:07 PM. Reason: addition

          Comment

          • Boyan B.
            Very Frequent User
            • September 1, 1999
            • 187

            #6
            Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

            Peter, can you post a photo of the engine pad? Sometimes, even when decked, you can see the original numbers still on the pad. You will loose minimum 38 points due to the broach marks, but in my opinion, if it's your original engine, I would do everything to keep it and live with it being decked.

            Its better than a "restoration" or "restamp" which is always suspect.

            Boyan 818 517-5016

            Comment

            • Philip C.
              Extremely Frequent Poster
              • December 1, 1984
              • 1117

              #7
              Re: 870 Block Identification - New Member Needs Help

              Originally posted by Peter Cook (49371)
              Dear NCRS members:

              My name is Peter Cook and I am a new NCRS member. I have been reading your technical discussions for the past few weeks and I have been impressed by the vast pool of knowledge and how helpful everyone is. I hope that you can all help me with proper identification of this 870 block.

              My vette is a 1964 roadster (VIN 40867 S107393 and "D18" assembly date) which I purchased two years ago without the original motor in it but with a block, crank, pistons, rods and heads which were purportedly the original block and heads for the motor. The block and heads were severely rusted from being left out in the elements for many years.

              A month or so ago I finally got around to trying to disassemble the engine but it was so rusted up I needed to bring the block to a machine shop for disassembly. During my attempted disassembly of the block, pistons and rods I noticed that the following: i.) all of the main, cam and rod bearings were brand new; ii.) the distrbutor was no longer attached to the engine but the distributor shaft was still there with its gear enmeshed with the camshaft; and iii.) there were no numbers or letters on the engine stamping pad. I discussed these facts with the machine shop and they seemed to believe that the block had been rebuilt many years ago (including the block being decked) and the distributor gear failed at initial start-up or shortly thereafter causing the engine to be shelved.

              Before sinking anymore money into this block I want to identify this block so that I can be sure of what I am dealing with. The block markings and information are as follows:
              1.) Engine block no. 3782870;
              2.) Foundry date on rear lip of block is "K28";
              3.) No engine pad stamps (apparently block was previously decked);
              4.) Ten dot forging clock above block no.;
              5.) Tell-tale Saginaw/Flint plug above timing chain area;
              6.) The numeral "3" next to the letters "GM" directly below the casting number; and
              7.) The machine shop has confirmed that this is a small journal block.

              Questions that I trying to get answered include the following:

              a.) Why does this block with a K28 casting date , apparently November 28, 1963, have no year included in the casting date?

              b.) According to my calendar November 28, 1963 was the fourth Thursday in November (viz., Thanksgiving day), was the Saginaw foundry really working on Thanksgiving day back in 1963?

              c.) Does the "3" next to the letters "GM" indicate that the block was cast in 1963?

              d.) Why does this block have a 10 dot clock on it if forged in 1963 (other threads indicate that this was feature did not appear uintil some time in 1964)?

              I look forward to your responses.

              Best regards,


              Peter Cook

              Direct view of pics from photobucket
              http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_1.jpg
              http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_2.jpg
              http://i436.photobucket.com/albums/qq87/xcookpac/09062008_870_3.jpg
              Hi Pete
              1) 3782870 blocks were used in corvette from 62 model year to 65 model year.
              2) casting date K23=Nov. 2nd 1963, for use 64 model year.
              3) You dont show a photo of the pad.
              4) Casting clocks started the experts say June 63 for Saginaw earlier for Tonawanda. I say earlier for Saginsaw/ Flint but that my two cents.
              5) Front plug OK all Saginaw/ Flint had'em
              6) #3 casting on block. They had more than one casting mold, so they numbered them.
              7) Should have small journal.

              A) See #2 above
              B) See #2 above
              C) NO see #6 above
              D) See #4 above
              Phil 8063


              em

              Comment

              • Peter C.
                Expired
                • August 27, 2008
                • 8

                #8
                870 Block Identification - New Member

                Thank you for all your help.

                I now feel much more confident about my 870 block and really learned something about the difficulty of identifying a casting code "3" versus an "8". It feels great to be a member of such a great organization where members come to the mutual aid of other members.

                Best regards,

                Peter Cook (49371)
                New NCRS Member

                PS I ran out of batteries while I was at the machine shop so I was not able to take a picture of the block stamp pad but it appeared completely blank (so I figured what is the point of going to get batteries in order to take a picture).

                Comment

                Working...
                Searching...Please wait.
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                There are no results that meet this criteria.
                Search Result for "|||"