I know, a leading question... I have a 56 with this rear end with these markings on it: H 22 6 3789812 GM6 with the big Positraction P on it.
Tell me if I'm reading this correctly. It is a Positraction rear end (at least the rear axle housing portion) dated August 22, 1956.
I have conflicting information...some stating that there were no positraction units in 56 Corvettes and another reference guide (53-72 Chassis Restoration Guide by Joseph Tripoli Jr.) that states that it is correct for a 56 also...I'm guessing that it meant for the early 57 cars that were produced in late 56. Since the JG does not mention a 56 posi option, I'm inclined to think that this on is an add-on housing portion to an original axle (with no drain in the bottom and only a small vent on the top drivers side).
Still, would this be correct for a '57, even though it was dated August of 56? I guess the 6 months would still apply, right? FYI, there is no stamp (at least nothing is legible) on the passenger side of the housing. Since it won't be judged, I'm not overly concerned, but I would just like to know what I am looking at.
Thanks for your help.
Mark
Tell me if I'm reading this correctly. It is a Positraction rear end (at least the rear axle housing portion) dated August 22, 1956.
I have conflicting information...some stating that there were no positraction units in 56 Corvettes and another reference guide (53-72 Chassis Restoration Guide by Joseph Tripoli Jr.) that states that it is correct for a 56 also...I'm guessing that it meant for the early 57 cars that were produced in late 56. Since the JG does not mention a 56 posi option, I'm inclined to think that this on is an add-on housing portion to an original axle (with no drain in the bottom and only a small vent on the top drivers side).
Still, would this be correct for a '57, even though it was dated August of 56? I guess the 6 months would still apply, right? FYI, there is no stamp (at least nothing is legible) on the passenger side of the housing. Since it won't be judged, I'm not overly concerned, but I would just like to know what I am looking at.
Thanks for your help.
Mark
Comment