71, 330hp with an AT?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Ron G.
    Very Frequent User
    • December 1, 1984
    • 861

    #16
    "SOLID LIFTERS MATTER"

    Comment

    • Joe L.
      Beyond Control Poster
      • February 1, 1988
      • 43133

      #17
      Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

      Originally posted by Ron Goduti (8076)
      Joe—-

      In regard to the exhaust on the Z 28 and the LT-1 Corvette, when I was 19 years old way back in 1972 I owned a 1970 Z 28 with an M 22, 410 rear, with the rally sport sport bumper package. If memory serves me right and I could be wrong, the rear exhaust pipes on the Camarillo I believe go up and over the rear axle which would also cause a very slight decrease in horsepower, but I personally believe that the 10 horse power increase in the Corvette was due to the cost the corvette being so much more money to purchase. Could have had something to do with theirmarketing program. Again, I could be wrong. Just my opinion.
      Ron------

      I had a friend who factory-ordered a 1970 Z-28 Camaro with M-22. He only drove the car the first day he got it (May 19, 1970) then stored it and never drove it again. The car has 186 miles on it today. He passed away about 4 years ago and his son now has the car. His intentions are the same as his father's----keep it stored away and not driven.
      In Appreciation of John Hinckley

      Comment

      • Drew P.
        Very Frequent User
        • July 1, 1977
        • 180

        #18
        Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

        Hello Joe,
        Do you know the paint color and trim color?
        Thank you,
        Drew Papsun

        Comment

        • Joe L.
          Beyond Control Poster
          • February 1, 1988
          • 43133

          #19
          Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

          Originally posted by Drew Papsun (1412)
          Hello Joe,
          Do you know the paint color and trim color?
          Thank you,
          Drew Papsun
          Drew------

          Yup. It is yellow with black vinyl interior.
          In Appreciation of John Hinckley

          Comment

          • Joe L.
            Beyond Control Poster
            • February 1, 1988
            • 43133

            #20
            Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

            All-----

            I was wrong. It's not 186 miles, it's 182 miles. Attached is a photo of the odometer I took a few years ago. I absolutely know the history of this car from the day it was delivered right to today. And, it is not for sale at ANY price.

            Attached Files
            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

            Comment

            • Paul O.
              Frequent User
              • September 1, 1990
              • 1716

              #21
              Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

              Joe

              Do you have a photo of the oil filter if it has not been changed.

              Comment

              • Joe L.
                Beyond Control Poster
                • February 1, 1988
                • 43133

                #22
                Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                Originally posted by Paul Oslansky (18046)
                Joe

                Do you have a photo of the oil filter if it has not been changed.
                Paul-----


                I do not have a photo. The filter was never changed. However, I did look at it. My recollection is that it's a white PF-25 with black silkscreening. I don't recall if it had an embossed bottom.
                In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                Comment

                • Peter M.
                  Very Frequent User
                  • May 31, 2013
                  • 358

                  #23
                  Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                  Joe,
                  I had a new 1970 Z-28 with M22 and 4.10 gears also. It was the absolute worst POS car I have ever owned!
                  It seemed to fall apart around me and worst of all it was a stone!

                  Comment

                  • Duke W.
                    Beyond Control Poster
                    • January 1, 1993
                    • 15500

                    #24
                    Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                    Originally posted by Larry Maher (10731)
                    I recall reading somewhere that the different air cleaner styles (open element on the Corvette vs dual snorkel on the Camaro) may have played a part in the different horsepower ratings.
                    The '71 330 HP rating was gross, so the vehicle induction and exhaust systems would not have been factors since GHP was measured on a lab dyno without those component; 1971 was also the first year that SAE net HP was specified, so the induction and complete exhaust systems would have been a factor in those ratings, but offhand I don't recall what they were.

                    From 1972-on only SAE net was advertised.

                    Duke

                    Comment

                    • Edward M.
                      Extremely Frequent Poster
                      • November 1, 1985
                      • 1915

                      #25
                      Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                      Direct from the Chevrolet Parts and Accessories Catalog

                      1971, 350 - 8 cylinder, T.H 400 tranmission, 330 hp, CJK engine code

                      Yes, I do know the real story about this engine code.
                      Attached Files

                      Comment

                      • Ron G.
                        Very Frequent User
                        • December 1, 1984
                        • 861

                        #26
                        Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                        There is a guy with an 1,100 mile 1970 Z28 automatic and the oil filter is black-and-white. Google 1100 mile 1970 Z 28 and it will come up. As far as a 1971 Corvette with a CJK code is concerned, it was anything but an LT-1.
                        "SOLID LIFTERS MATTER"

                        Comment

                        • Ron G.
                          Very Frequent User
                          • December 1, 1984
                          • 861

                          #27
                          Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                          Sorry, I meant to say that I used to own one.
                          "SOLID LIFTERS MATTER"

                          Comment

                          • Joe L.
                            Beyond Control Poster
                            • February 1, 1988
                            • 43133

                            #28
                            Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                            Originally posted by Edward McComas (9316)
                            Direct from the Chevrolet Parts and Accessories Catalog

                            1971, 350 - 8 cylinder, T.H 400 tranmission, 330 hp, CJK engine code

                            Yes, I do know the real story about this engine code.
                            Ed------


                            There are errors in the Chevrolet Parts & Accessories Catalogs. This is one of them.
                            In Appreciation of John Hinckley

                            Comment

                            • Edward M.
                              Extremely Frequent Poster
                              • November 1, 1985
                              • 1915

                              #29
                              Re: 71, 330hp with an AT?

                              I knew that guys; I also used to own a 1971 CJK car.

                              But I have lost count of the number op times I have seen 1971 LT-1, automatic cars offered for sale, with this very page stuck on the windshield.

                              I was actually real impressed with one of these, as the seller built the original CJK engine to 1971 LT-1 specifications with correct parts.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              Searching...Please wait.
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

                              Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
                              An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
                              There are no results that meet this criteria.
                              Search Result for "|||"