IF vs EF 962 crankshaft & rods

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Joe L.
    Beyond Control Poster
    • February 1, 1988
    • 43133

    #16
    Re: IF vs EF 962 crankshaft & rods

    Originally posted by Bill Williamson (3245)
    Joe . The L78 & L88 both used the same starter , flywheel , radiator ,core support . They both had ribbed blocks . The 66 didnt use any of these .I am not sure if a 66 425 used a cross drilled crank or not .

    Bill------

    I thought you were referring to the basic engine rather than peripherals, although the flywheel and clutch could be regarded as part of the basic engine rather than peripherals. Those components might be regarded as HD and were essentially the same for L-78 and L-88. The starter was not in any way a HD component. It was identical to the starter used on all other big blocks except for the starter nose. The nose had to be different because of the flywheel's 153 tooth count versus the 168 tooth count for other big blocks.

    The radiator was unique to L-78 and L-88 (and most LS-6, too). However, I do not regard it as a HD component. It actually had about the same cooling capacity as the copper/brass radiator used on other 66-67 big blocks although it was a bit lighter weight.

    I am not aware that L-88 used a ribbed block. If it did, it would surprise me.
    In Appreciation of John Hinckley

    Comment

    Working...
    Searching...Please wait.
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because you have logged in since the previous page was loaded.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An unexpected error was returned: 'Your submission could not be processed because the token has expired.

    Please push the back button and reload the previous window.'
    An internal error has occurred and the module cannot be displayed.
    There are no results that meet this criteria.
    Search Result for "|||"