If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ You must be an NCRS member before you can post: click the Join NCRS link above to join. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. If you have trouble logging in you can clear your cookies here!
Rich, I think early 68 inside handles were a one year only handle, it may have been changed later. the early ones had a smooth backside surface and the later ones had reinforcing ribs for strength.
New England chapter member, 63 Convert. 327/340- Chapter/Regional/national Top Flight, 72 coupe- chapter and regional Top Flight.
Rich, I think early 68 inside handles were a one year only handle, it may have been changed later. the early ones had a smooth backside surface and the later ones had reinforcing ribs for strength.
I think you are correct. I remember a discussion about this. The one that broke was clearly a repro. I borrowed one from a friend with an early 68 that's down for a while and I think it's original and has no ribs. My car is a July build but I'm sure the handles on it were not original.
I'm not getting the car judged nor do I think that part is judged. As long as it fits and looks ok, I'll be a happy camper.
Rich
1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible
I think you are correct. I remember a discussion about this. The one that broke was clearly a repro. I borrowed one from a friend with an early 68 that's down for a while and I think it's original and has no ribs. My car is a July build but I'm sure the handles on it were not original.
I'm not getting the car judged nor do I think that part is judged. As long as it fits and looks ok, I'll be a happy camper.
Rich
Rich-------
If functionality is the primary objective, go with the handle with the ribs. GM did not change the design to the ribbed variety because the earlier design was just as good. In fact, you have a broken one which likely illustrates the problem with the earlier design.
The left side part number was GM #3962693. Plenty of these for sale on eBay from NOS to crappy used condition.
There were three types. Big thick cast ones, the flat thin ones and the later ones with ribs.
The current 1968-69 TIM&JG has a photo of all three on p. 13 with approximate change dates. The only one that was serviced by GM and is being reproduced is the last type with the ribbing. And yes the handle style is judged.
The current 1968-69 TIM&JG has a photo of all three on p. 13 with approximate change dates. The only one that was serviced by GM and is being reproduced is the last type with the ribbing. And yes the handle style is judged.
Thanks Reba
Time to update my TM/JG!
Rich
1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible
I bought the expensive one from Eklers which came in a "Genuine GM" parts box with a p/n of 3962693 and it doesn't fit. The casting is way off from the cheap repro that broke and the early 68 original I had borrowed, both of which fit perfectly. It will not slide on nearly far enough leaving a large gap between the rear of the handle and the door trim. The screw is then too short.
Eklers were no help as they explained they get these from GM. They did offer to exchange it but I bet they are all like this. We took a dremmel tool to it and after three tries got it to fit a little better. There is still at least a quarter inch gap. I'll live with this until I find an original or I may buy several cheap ones. Also there is a defect in the plating on the top edge which I didn't notice until after we ground the crap out of it. :-)
Rich
1966 L79 Convertible. Milano Maroon
1968 L71 Coupe. Rally Red (Sold 6/21)
1963 Corvair Monza Convertible
I bought the expensive one from Eklers which came in a "Genuine GM" parts box with a p/n of 3962693 and it doesn't fit. The casting is way off from the cheap repro that broke and the early 68 original I had borrowed, both of which fit perfectly. It will not slide on nearly far enough leaving a large gap between the rear of the handle and the door trim. The screw is then too short.
Eklers were no help as they explained they get these from GM. They did offer to exchange it but I bet they are all like this. We took a dremmel tool to it and after three tries got it to fit a little better. There is still at least a quarter inch gap. I'll live with this until I find an original or I may buy several cheap ones. Also there is a defect in the plating on the top edge which I didn't notice until after we ground the crap out of it. :-)
Rich
Rich------
I cannot understand that, at all. The GM #3962693 (and 3962694) has been cataloged by GM as the SERVICE replacement for 1968 Corvettes since February, 1969. I would imagine that a lot have been sold for 1968 Corvettes since that time, especially because of the propensity of the 1968 handles to break. This is the first time I've heard of a fitment problem when the 3962693 or 3962694 were used on a 1968.
Comment