Is this the real deal or not? Last four of the VIN are obscured for a reason that I cannot comment on at this time.
67 engine pad question
Collapse
X
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
I would be suspect, as the engine build stamping is to much in line with the VIN stamping. Most of the engine stampings are closer to the head on big blocks.
Just my .02
Mike- Top
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
This is the stamping of my original 390/427. Vin is close to the one you photo'dAttached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
Stamping looks too 'pretty' not the typical stamping we see on a like kind BB engines. Both stampings show to stamped with about the same amount of pressure.Last edited by Michael G.; January 21, 2015, 08:04 PM.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
Request that this thread be deleted. The owner of either the car or the engine has complained to Corvette Forum and had the thread on that site removed. I purposely did not identify the specific car, but it was identified anyway.
Not wanting to stir up any more stuff.
Please delete this thread.- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
Request that this thread be deleted. The owner of either the car or the engine has complained to Corvette Forum and had the thread on that site removed. I purposely did not identify the specific car, but it was identified anyway.
Not wanting to stir up any more stuff.
Please delete this thread.65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
I stand by my posting earlier that my engine stamp is legit. I've owned the car since 1982, have the original tank sticker, been thru numerous NCRS judgings, including regional and national levels where I've received repeated Top Flite recognition without any comments on the stamping.Attached Files- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
I stand by my posting earlier that my engine stamp is legit. I've owned the car since 1982, have the original tank sticker, been thru numerous NCRS judgings, including regional and national levels where I've received repeated Top Flite recognition without any comments on the stamping.
Your engine pad looks legit to me too. However, I also happen to agree with Ken and his posting. Objectively speaking your length of ownership does not validate the stamp pad, the tank sticker does not validate the stamp pad, and NCRS Flight Judging does not validate the stamp pad. The absence of comments on the stamp pad through all levels of Flight judging only means that it appears/presents correct and typical of production; not that it is original or validated.
Phil- Top
Comment
-
Re: 67 engine pad question
Stephen
Your engine pad looks legit to me too. However, I also happen to agree with Ken and his posting. Objectively speaking your length of ownership does not validate the stamp pad, the tank sticker does not validate the stamp pad, and NCRS Flight Judging does not validate the stamp pad. The absence of comments on the stamp pad through all levels of Flight judging only means that it appears/presents correct and typical of production; not that it is original or validated.
Phil65 350 TI CONV 67 J56 435 CONV,67,390/AIR CONV,70 454/air CONV,
What A MAN WON'T SPEND TO GIVE HIS ASS A RIDE- Top
Comment
Comment